the people can re-elect someone like narendra modi. a leader who is heavily biased towards the majority and dangerous for the minorty. this can easily discredit democracy. how does it matter if democracy's name is sullied anyway. the point is that it is unfair. whenever somebody talks about change, these words are thrown up. threatens democracy, goes against the koran, is anti gandhian, is illegal, unconstitutional.

if hillary clinton flies around the globe 24 times she is applauded for her statesmanship. however if pratibha patil does is, then she is wasting government money. why is this so?  maybe if kalam visited all those countries, then people would not have minded so much, they would think he was outgoing and swashbuckling or whatever. so, what is it about pratibha patil? is it because we consider her incompetent? what does kalam have that pratibha patil doesn't? a penis?what is the role of the president anyway?

so hilary clinton comes to india to mediate discussions of water between india and bangladesh. why?